Advertisements

In Honor of Today’s Climate Strike: Founder of the Weather Channel says Manmade Climate Change is bologna.

Support us & Get Cool Stuff!

The World is striking in honor of Climate Chanhe today. In honor of the hoax, perpetuated by Mainstream Media, we honor the debunkers.

Founder of the Weather Channel,John Coleman says Manmade Climate Change is bologna.

Listen to the scientists, the ones that are PAID by the government to produce data PROVING Manmade Climate Change. Seems Legit…

the first thing we need to accept, say these scientists, is that “CARBON DIOXIDE IS NOT ITSELF A POLLUTANT.” (Emphasis in original, except where noted.) The view that CO2 is a pollutant is the single biggest lie of the entire environmental movement. 
CO2 is not a pollutant, it is plant food. It is, as these scientists say, “indispensable for life on our planet.” Plants absorb CO2 and use it to grow. They also release oxygen into the atmosphere, which is a nice thing if you like to breathe. 
If you run a greenhouse and you want to turbo-charge plant growth, you can do it by injecting CO2 into the greenhouse. Side by side videos of plants in an environment with normal CO2 levels and plants in an environment with highly elevated levels of CO2 show an astounding difference in the rate of growth. In fact, an area the size of the United States has greened up around the world as the CO2 concentration has increased. CO2 is not our enemy. CO2 is our friend. 

For instance, there is no correlation between rising CO2 levels and increased tropical cyclone activity. There is, however, a strong correlation between cyclonic activity and the completely natural Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, an oscillation that runs in roughly 60-year cycles. 

-afa.net


There are many sientific contradicting papers by eminent scientists. They are never screened on msm because regardless of common sense and opinions many fear voicing them, as to do so,would end their careers. Two most recent scientific papers from Finland and Japan refute man made CC. However a chemistry student did a simple experiment that proved that C02 cools as opposed to heating. There are at least 6 you tube videos produced by scientists to refute CC 3 of the best conducted by scientists using different methods but arriving at the same conclusion. The era from the 1930,s to the 1979 was the most poluting in history so where are the figures for this 50 year period. Fundementals within the models used by the IPCC are wrong so they cannot produce a true outcome. The CC hoax has made many millionairs and NGO,s and various quangos very rich.”

-Margaret Robinson

Ice Sheets in Greenland are growing, according to NASA.

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nasa-study-mass-gains-of-antarctic-ice-sheet-greater-than-losses

The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.

According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed   to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.

NASA.gov

There is no “consensus” as they’d have you believe…here’s a big list of scientitsts that don’t believe in Global Warming. From Wikipedia:

These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the 21st century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.

Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variabilityozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[83]

These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.

Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown

These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.

Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences

These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.

Advertisements
You Might Like
You Might Like
%d bloggers like this: