Advertisements

Texas Court Ok’s Child Abuse?

“Political social scientific experiments” are taking place before our very eyes. It has to stop.

Advertisements
Support us & Get Cool Stuff!

Texas Court Ok’s Child Abuse? The jury of a Texas family court recently ruled that a mother can allow her son to transition to a girl. This is a sad day in America. A sad day in the criminal justice system. A sad day for all those who do their darndest to protect the innocent. In essence, a court has ok’d child abuse. What other way can this be interpreted?

The ruling comes on the heels of a lengthy court battle between Jeff Younger and his ex-wife Anne Georgulas. At issue, whether or not their son, James, has gender dysphoria. 

Before the ruling, both parents had joint custody. But the mother asked for complete custody after the father wouldn’t agree to refer to his son as a girl. The mother then petitioned the court for sole custody. 

According to the LifeSiteNews, sole custody allows the mother to move forward with puberty blockers, which can cause chemical castration, and, potentially, hormones, if she so chooses.  

How can a court give a parent the right to alter the genetic makeup of a child? A child who probably still has his/her primary teeth intact. This child hasn’t lived long enough nor has the knowledge to comprehend such a drastic undertaking to his body. Imagine the emotional and psychology aftermath this process will have on the child as he matures. 

Hmm…

There is something nefarious at play. We see it all over. Shh… Liberal schools introducing alternative curriculums on gender and science. Not to mention Hollywood glamourizing ambiguous children (Angelina Jolie, Charlize Theron, and the dislike of masculinity. All of that is at play and then some). 

Only recently it was reported that boys can have periods. (No they can’t). “Political social science” at play.  https://magamedia.org/2019/10/22/period/

And this poor kid, James, who is all of seven-years-old, hasn’t a clue. He is being used as a “political social scientific experiment” and doesn’t even realize it. God Bless The Child.

His mother, a pediatrician, has argued that James is transgender. Who told him that? She is adamant that he should be able to wear dresses and attend school as a girl named Luna. (Did anyone bother to tell this mother that most little girls wear pants to school? Where did the name Luna come from?)

The boy’s father says his son is just experiencing some confusion with gender. He maintains his ex-wife has been forcing their son to socially transition into a girl by making him wear dresses and painting his nails, and she has told the boy monsters get little boys.   

Do kids know what gender means at this age? Sure they are aware of boys and girls but to the infinite detail. Monsters get little boys? This mother is cruel.

While I blame the jury for this outrageous verdict, the mother is ultimately at fault. She is a pediatrician. Of all people, she should know better.  

In a newsletter published by the American College of Pediatricians, “Hormone blocking agents induce a disease state (the absence of puberty) at a critical time in a child’s physical, emotional and mental development. Sex hormones not only trigger the development of secondary sex characteristics but also influence the development of the adolescent brain. This likely explains why most Gender Identity Disorder children come to accept their biological gender during adolescence.”  

Published in October 2011, the newsletter, which I’m sure Geroglaus the pediatrician has seen, states that puberty-blocking (hormone therapy) is harmful.  

Dr. Michelle Cretella, the vice president of the college, stated in the letter that, “physicians and therapists who embrace hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery for children promote a political agenda not scientific advance.” She continued saying, “this is obvious once the euphemisms are shed: Chemical castration and the surgical mutilation of children is not ‘therapy.’ It is cold, calculated, institutionalized child abuse at the hands of those charged with healing.”

There you have it. A court rendered child abuse on a seven-year-old. At what point is enough, enough?  

So what if he wants to wear dresses, play with dolls or have his nails painted. That doesn’t translate into wanting to be a girl. Nor does it translate into wanting to have his genitals removed. 

This boy is too young to make an informed decision that will affect him for the rest of his life. His mother, a pediatrician, is too politically dumb to understand the harm she is bringing to this child. Why would a jury give this woman custody? 

In the end, there will be a price to pay. These children will grow up being confused and emotionally disturbed. They will be new problems in society. These scientific experiments society is conducting on innocent children must stop. 

James has a twin brother who identifies as being a boy.

~~~~

 

Advertisements
You Might Like
You Might Like
Loading cart ⌛️ ...
%d bloggers like this: