Just last month I posted a couple of articles The Islamic Trojan Horse and The Islamic States of America: One Nation Under Allah in which I explained how our American society is capitulating to the whim of Islamists our freedoms of speech and religion which are inevitably welcoming the Islamic conquest of our land, one town at a time. This is because while the federal government remains dormant, many state governments — including those controlled by Republicans — do their best to accommodate Muslims waging jihad against America, and the hard-left Marxist-Democrats — including nearly all of the local and national media — are collaborators in the enemy’s efforts.
President Ronald Reagan once said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction.” Nowadays it might be more accurate to rephrase that to “never more than one election away.” Such was the insight offered by William Kilpatrick who recently stated that if the Democrats should regain the presidency, and possibly the Senate, in next year’s election, we can expect a marked increase in Islamic influence over our government and our society. Now that “Muhammad” made the list of the ten most popular baby names in the U.S. for the first time, there is plenty of reason to worry.
President Obama infamously said that “the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam.” Many of his policies and appointments seemed geared to ensure that critics of Islam would have no future.
In March 2011, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) passed Resolution 16/18, which called on all countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping, and stigmatization of religious belief,” but stopped short of mandating criminal penalties, even though it did recognize the Muslim Brotherhood invented the concept of Islamophobia. With the backing of President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC)-sponsored Resolution 66/167 quietly passed the 193-member UN General Assembly on December 19, 2011. This was widely viewed as marking a significant step toward making defamation of Islam and Islamophobia recognized legal concepts that could be criminalized.
On September 27, 2012, in a nighttime raid, U.S. federal authorities arrested Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the producer of a short YouTube video that mocked the Prophet Muhammad. Mr. Nakoula was found guilty of probation violation and was sentenced to one year in prison. Of course, his real crime was that he had slandered the Prophet of Islam. Did such a crackdown just happen out of coincidence?
Obama, during his eight-year tenure, fostered close ties with the Muslim Brotherhood — an organization that has been labeled as the “mother of all terrorist groups” — and he actively facilitated the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt under Mohamed Morsi. Meanwhile, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, worked closely with the Saudi-backed (OIC) — it is the world’s second-largest international NGO with a powerful voting bloc in the United Nations, which upholds the doctrines and goals of global Islamic supremacy based on the Quranic teachings and the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad — to criminalize any criticism of Islam. While Kilpatrick’s analysis is right on target, the openness to Islam started with President George W. Bush and the GOP.
It was in fact, President Bush who said just a week after the Towers fell on 9/11, “Islam Is Peace.” His discourse, according to Robert Spencer, “deformed the West’s response to the resurgent jihad and poisoned the public discourse, so that the attempts to discuss this problem honestly are consigned to realms of Islomophobia.” Since then Islamists, like a Trojan horse, have been able to infiltrate our society, as for example, in the field of education, creating an environment of receptivity and understanding for the next generation of Americans to accept their sharia-based lifestyle. Saudi money has financed institutions alongside multitudes of other Islamic organizations across the world and within the United States (80 percent of 1,200 mosques operating in the United States were built after 2003). Qatar’s equal vision for America is being peddled through our children’s classrooms, targeting a pliable population and one with a long shelf life.
How have they accomplished this? It is because of our “openness” that has allowed:
- Muslims concentrated their efforts in these communities, built up their numbers, and then asked for accommodations. Once their numbers were significant enough, they made demands of local officials to accommodate sharia.
- Islamic leaders have purchased numerous plots of land in these communities – often with funds from Saudi Arabia – and began building of Mosques/Islamic Centers, Islamic schools, etc. Once the mosques were built, land immediately around the mosque was purchased for muslims and, over time, muslims began occupying the land around the mosque up to a radius of approximately 3 miles.
- Islamic organizations began outreaching to local Christian and Jewish leaders, as well as law enforcement and elected officials with positive results. The majority of Pastors and Rabbis stood/stand with jihadis (“terrorists”) and publicly defend them because the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Interfaith Outreach” efforts work; many elected officials believe they “have to” meet with jihadi leaders to show how “progressive and open minded” they are; and law enforcement remains unaware of the grave threat growing like a cancer in their communities.
- Collaborators in the media wrote/write glowing stories about how wonderful the
jihadisMuslims are and defend them right up to and, in some cases, after they kill Americans (e.g., New York Times defending Anwar al Awlaki after the U.S. government killed him because he was the Al Qaeda leader in Yemen).
In Hamtramck, Michigan, a small suburb of Detroit, is the first town in the U.S. to have a majority muslim city council. This formerly Polish-Catholic town has been overrun by sharia-adherent muslims who have already achieved accommodations for sharia in the community. In Falls Church, Virginia, an independent city of the Virgina Commonwealth, is home to the Muslim Brotherhood/Hamas’ Dar al Hijra Islamic Center. The Muslim Brotherhood leader of Dar al Hijra, Sheikh Shaker el-Sayed (former President of the MB’s Muslim American Society), in 2017 gave a lecture promoting female genital mutilation. Dar al Hijra is a jihadi factory whose property is owned by the MB’s bank NAIT (North American Islamic Trust).
This past October the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition presented by the Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), to hear Wood v. Arnold, a case brought by Caleigh Wood, a Christian student in 11th grade at La Plata High School in La Plata, Maryland. Wood refused to take part in a school exercise she felt would deny her faith “by making a written profession of the Muslim conversion prayer known as the shahada — “There is no god by Allah and Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.” The TMLC argues the school violated the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Speech clauses when it ordered Wood to do an assignment that she could not complete without violating her Christian beliefs. The teacher then gave her a failing grade. This is not just a violation of the First Amendment but an ongoing, albeit subtle, diffusion of Islam in our Western society.
It is true that President Donald Trump has taken an open stance against Islamic terrorism — the very fact he mentioned “Islamic” is already a step forward. However, ever since he ventured to Riyadh in 2017 — his first foreign trip as president — Trump has catered to the preferences of the Saudi royal family, consequently allowing the Saudis and their like-minded associates the flexibility to defuse their Wahhabi draconian doctrine. Notwithstanding his continual backing the regime’s genocidal war on Yemen, ignoring Riyadh’s continuing support for Islamic radicalism, his silence on their mounting human rights violations, and acting as if American armed forces constitute the royals’ personal bodyguards at the crown prince’s beck and call by sending thousands of our troops to protect their oil fields, Trump is not the Marxist-LGTB-Islamist ideologue as the Democrats have proven themselves to be.
Kilpatrick is correct in saying that there is no doubt that if Democrats should retake the government, it is a more than a foregone conclusion that the promotion of Islam which took place under Obama will resurface, i.e., while the pro-Islamic campaign has suffered a partial setback under Trump — this is a disputed point — it will once again become a top priority. The Democrat Party is now much more radical and left-leaning than it was under Obama, and, like leftists everywhere, party members will be tempted to ally themselves with forces that are subversive of American freedoms — keeping in mind that present White House administration has bent over backwards for the Saudis who are pretentious allies at best. All one has to do is look at its advocacy of children as young as five have the right to have a sex-change.
Keep in mind that colonization is the short term goal, as a minimum, for Islamists. They do not need to necessarily conquer, just control. What is to be done? Like the civil rights movement of the 60s and 70s, we as a people cannot stay silent on the sidelines in what has become a “Cold War” between leftists (and neo-conservatives) and the American people who are trying to uphold the freedoms our Founding Fathers provided. We must make our voices heard, not just at the voting booths, but by holding our elected officials accountable. Ultimately, we shall overcome this phenomenon by restructuring the traditional concept of the family, which is based on the marriage between male and female with the end of the procreation and proper formation of the progeny.
FOLLOW https://thegreatarchitect.blog/ for more great articles.
Published with exclusive permission.